2018 Mac mini with peripherals You've got a new and you've plugged in a keyboard, a mouse or trackpad, maybe even a printer too. All you need now is a monitor. But first, a word - this article is more about narrowing down a monitor choice for the general office user or home user. If precise color is what you need, that is another piece for another day.
First thoughts Before you even consider what type of monitor you should buy, you need to examine whether you need one at all. If you're planning to work at your Mac mini all the time, if it's to be your main machine, then you have to have a monitor.
If you plan to use the Mac mini as a server and leave it on a shelf somewhere, then you don't. In either of those cases, the decision is easy. Where it gets harder is when you think that you're going to be half and half. Maybe you expect to be using the Mac mini extensively on the two days a week you're in your office and the rest of the time it's just a server.
If that's the case, just buy yourself a monitor anyway. The inconvenience of borrowing one from another machine or somehow bringing one with you to the office is not worth it. Your time is more valuable than the cost of a display. Remote controlling a Mac via an iPad Except of course that with software for a fair amount of casual use cases. Maybe you carry the iPad around with you most of the week and pop it on top of the Mac mini when you're in your office. You could use that same iPad or any other device to remotely log in to the Mac mini.
Registered: 2018-09-27. Theme: Best Monitor for Mac mini setup. Re: Best mac mini setup. 5 reasons why you shouldn't buy a Mac mini - Macworld UK The Mac mini is Apple's tiny desktop computer and the cheapest Mac you can buy, but it doesn't come with a monitor, mouse.
As great as that ability is, as much as we use it, it's best for short tasks. You wouldn't edit a Photoshop image over a remote connection. Next, size If you've decided you do need a monitor, you're going to need to think about the cost, the resolution and how it will physically connect to your Mac mini. First, though, you need to choose a size and we're going to do that for you - we like the general size and area of the 27-inch monitor for your Mac mini - assuming you have the desk real estate. You can go smaller and get a 21.5-inch one, but today that feels cramped. Curved monitors are deeply appealing but take up so much room Or you could go far the other way and have a 34, 38- or 43-inch monitor which gently curves like it's going to tap you on the shoulder.
![]()
There's no denying that those are very appealing but before you even get to their sobering price, there is the fact that they're all around five times wider than your Mac mini. And, for instance, is typically $969 so it costs more than your Mac mini. The price isn't just about size, though.
And is a 34-inch model but it comes with Thunderbolt 3 ports, HDMI, USB 3.0 and DisplayPort. You could compromise and go for a 24-inch model such as the which sells for around $210. The Dell U2415 is a solid choice That has a smaller footprint and overall takes up less room than a wide, curved display but it is a compromise between screen real estate and space on your desk. Like we said, the better compromise is 27-inches.
You get that much more on the screen and the monitor doesn't take up that much more room. You do just need to forget that one of the very best 27-inch monitors comes with an iMac wrapped around it.
There is also the 27-inch for around $550 or the. Make a resolution Today you can get monitors that display in 5K resolution, 4K resolution and sundry lesser ones you probably shouldn't think about buying new.
You may be able to get a cheap deal on a display that's less than 4K it would take some effort and the savings wouldn't be great. Certainly not great enough to make up for the hours you'll spend staring at it. Apple developed this monitor with LG Similarly, you could get an deal on a 5K display. Officially, Apple only sells one type of monitor and it doesn't make any.
At the Apple Store and select third-party retailers, you will find, which retails for $1,299.99. As with all monitors, prices vary hugely but you can also get that.
As a bonus, both of the LG monitors have the same DPI as your MacBook Pro does. The rest, with a 4K panel in about 27 inches comes in at around 165ppi. This is still pretty sharp and clear, but if you have a Retina MacBook Pro open next to it, you can tell the difference. There is nothing wrong with spending money to get what you need.
In fact, buying something inadequate for your work is far more of a waste of money. Nonetheless, if you are not totally certain that you need a 5K monitor, you don't, and it probably isn't worth the investment at this time. What works The Mac mini takes monitors with various different connectors and resolutions. You can get adaptors to make the machine take more types of connector but out of the box, it's ready for Thunderbolt 3 and anything you can connect through USB-C, meaning DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort, and HDMI with an inexpensive cable.
The connector ports on the back of a 2018 Mac mini There are many jobs where you need the fastest connection specification, the greatest color gamut and the widest screen. There are also many jobs where you'd like that. Yet for the majority of us doing the majority of work we do, all that matters is whether the monitor will work when you connect it to a 2018 Mac mini. If the monitor is sold as Thunderbolt 3, USB-C, HDMI, or DisplayPort, you're in luck. You're not exactly out of luck if the monitor needs a VGA connection, though, as you'd just need to buy. A VGA connection means a VGA monitor, though, and your Mac mini is capable of so much better. Think of the future Your Mac mini can't be upgraded very much.
You can and then only a certain amount. Your monitor, on the other hand, can't be upgraded at all.
It's true that you could eventually sideline it. You could buy a second or even third monitor and have one of those be your main display with the others to the side. The Mac mini can support up to three displays at a time if two of them are USB-C and the third is HDMI.
Take your time choosing the right display, though, and the combination of that plus the Mac mini is going to be superb. You make your choice and then you have to live with looking at it for many hours a day. Keep up with AppleInsider by downloading the for iOS, and, Twitter and for live, late-breaking coverage. You can also check out our official account for exclusive photos.I too ended up settling on an AOC design at 40' 4K and thus 110 dpi, so it matches the cinema, thunderbolt and macbook pro scaling. Additionally it offers four inputs (Apple TV anyone?), PIP, has a slight elegant curve, low energy use, etc, etc. It was the largest of any I could comfortably use on a standard desk, with 43' being peripherally too large for me.
I added a fully adjustable Ergotron base for a modest sum, and now find 27' displays seem 'cramped'. Another bonus is because it avoids what seems to me Apple's 'bag of hurt' of 5K I have found it works with every mac I've tried back to 2009, if at 30hz prior to 2012. And the price? Well I would simply say it is priced 'for the rest of us'. I keep hoping Apple may follow suit with both 4K and 8K 'Pro' retina in such a size, and I still have fond memories of my 30' Cinema Display from the SJ era. Edited December 7. Why the heck would anybody buy a 27' or 21.5' display for their Mac Mini?
I know why I would, but I'm curious about why you wouldn't? What size do you think is better suited to the mini? I was planning to use a pair of 32' displays, but after working in a studio that has a 32' beside a 27', I found the 27' more comfortable. The 32 required 'looking around' to find stuff - too big to take in everything in a single point of gaze. Plus it ties up a lot of space and is always in the way when trying to hear the centre speaker. Why the heck would anybody buy a 27' or 21.5' display for their Mac Mini? I know why I would, but I'm curious about why you wouldn't?
What size do you think is better suited to the mini? I was planning to use a pair of 32' displays, but after working in a studio that has a 32' beside a 27', I found the 27' more comfortable. The 32 required 'looking around' to find stuff - too big to take in everything in a single point of gaze. Plus it ties up a lot of space and is always in the way when trying to hear the centre speaker.
At 43' and native resolution the text is a reasonable size at desktop distances (ie about arms length). At 21.5' I'm not sure I can read text without making it larger and that kinda defeats the purpose of 4K no? 27' strikes me as small as well.
My 5K iMac at home also has a 2nd TB2 monitor with none of the graphics issues my Mini has. It's an office PC so it's not like I'm doing much on it, but it's too bad Apple didn't have an option for a discreet GPU for the Mini. Intel's integrated graphics is really pathetic. Shame on them. Without an explanation from the powers that be (technical not business eg.
Heat?) I've seen the graphics issue raised in numerous reviews. Like the acknowledged misjudgements of the pro tower, LG monitors, killing off of 'peoples choice' time capsules, the T2gate cost of 'onboard' storage, and the often questioned touchbar, so many of the design decisions raise questions these days from Apple. Let's hope we get a BTO GPU option (vega?) for the mini asap, along with an iMac update like last December. Great article but one key point was strangely overlooked: bezel thickness. If you look at the Benq linked in the article, you'll see a beautiful display with bezels about as thin as my EIZO Flexscan 27'. However, as is the case with my EIZO, that lovely BENQ is 1440p.
It's not bad but not Retina either. The thing I cannot understand is why all the high resolution 4K and higher monitors are so ugly.
No, I'm not talking about the curved monitors but rather the more manageable 27' size. Even the LG 5K display has ugly bezels in my opinion, and when you look at a display, you will notice how your display looks overall, not just the pixel image. To me, size and price matter, but so do the bezels and overall beauty of the display when its not even turned on. Why the heck would anybody buy a 27' or 21.5' display for their Mac Mini? I know why I would, but I'm curious about why you wouldn't? What size do you think is better suited to the mini? I was planning to use a pair of 32' displays, but after working in a studio that has a 32' beside a 27', I found the 27' more comfortable.
The 32 required 'looking around' to find stuff - too big to take in everything in a single point of gaze. Plus it ties up a lot of space and is always in the way when trying to hear the centre speaker. At 43' and native resolution the text is a reasonable size at desktop distances (ie about arms length).
At 21.5' I'm not sure I can read text without making it larger and that kinda defeats the purpose of 4K no? 27' strikes me as small as well. Heck, with my crappy eyes the text is too small even on the 32'! I definitely see the merits of a larger screen, especially at higher resolutions. Discovering that I preferred the 27' came as a surprise. I really thought I'd like the bigger screen. Why the heck would anybody buy a 27' or 21.5' display for their Mac Mini?
Because a 27 inch monitor would allow the mini to be an iMac substitute. You know, the machine for which Tim Cook is far too busy doing other things to sign the approval form to release the next update. Incremental CPU bumps are irrelevant.
The iMacs have received so much love since my 2011 model it’s crazy. The pro or 5k just blow it out of the water. And yet, even my old 2011 model, which was maxed out, still serves as my primary desktop. I’m an enterprise software engineer. This is what people mean when they talk about TCO and why Macs are cheaper than commodity PCs. Edited December 8.
Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |